CRIMINAL LAW - SPECIAL PART/SPECIFIC CRIMES

Antonino SESSA CRIMINAL LAW - SPECIAL PART/SPECIFIC CRIMES

0160100121
DIPARTIMENTO DI SCIENZE GIURIDICHE (SCUOLA DI GIURISPRUDENZA)
EQF7
LAW
2022/2023

OBBLIGATORIO
YEAR OF COURSE 5
YEAR OF DIDACTIC SYSTEM 2012
AUTUMN SEMESTER
CFUHOURSACTIVITY
654LESSONS


Objectives
THE TEACHING AIMS TO PROVIDE THE STUDENTS A GENERAL FRAME OF CRIMINAL LAWS SPECIAL PART, ALSO REFERRING TO THE RELATIONS INSISTING WITH THE GENERAL PART. STARTING FROM A CONCEPTUAL DEFINITION, WILL BE ANALYZED SPECIAL PART CLASSIFICATION AND NORM TYPING TECHNIQUES.
THROUGH THE AXIOLOGICALLY ORIENTED TELEOLOGICAL METHOD, THE COURSE WILL PROVIDE A RENEWED INTERPRETATION OF CRIMES THEORY AND OF THE CASES OF THE PENAL CODES SPECIAL PART, WITH ATTENTION TO NORM SOURCES AND ALSO TO EUROPEAN AND INTERNATIONAL LEGISLATION.
IN THIS WAY, THE STUDENT WILL UNDERSTAND CHARACTERISTICS, CONTENTS AND MEANING OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF CRIMINAL LAWS SPECIAL PART.

THE RESULTS WHICH THE COURSE AIMS ARE:

A)KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITY TO UNDERSTAND
GENERAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE THEORY AND PRINCIPLES OF THE SPECIAL PART OF CRIMINAL CODE WHICH DEALS TO THE CAPABILITY TO MANAGE COSTITUTIONAL VALUES WITHIN THE PENAL SYSTEM. ACCORDING TO THIS BENCHMARK, SELECTION TECHNIQUES FOR PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SCREENING WILL BE THE NECESSARY FILTER ON THE HERMENEUTIC AND LEGISLATIVE GROUNDS.

B)ABILITY TO APPLY KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING
ABILITY TO APPLY WITH MINDFUL KNOWLEDGE THE LEGAL ISTITUTIONS, IN A DIMENSION THAT, BETWEEN BEING AND HAVING TO BE, IS ABLE TO ORGANIZE THE WHOLE SYSTEM OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACCORDING TO RATIONAL CRITERIA.
ACQUISITION AND MASTERY OF CRITICAL TOOLS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A LOGICAL-LEGAL PATH, ABLE TO PROVIDE USEFUL TOOLS TO THE ANALYSIS OF COMPLEX SITUATIONS IN CONTEXTS OF STUDY AND WORKING.

TRANSVERSAL SKILLS:

INDIPENDENCE OF JUDGMENT. ABILITY TO GATHER AND INTERPRET CRITICALLY COMPLEX INFORMATIONS IN THE SPECIFIC STUDYING AREA;

COMMUNICATIONS SKILLS. ABILITY TO COMMUNICATE TO A NON SPECIALIST AUDIENCE, INFORMATIONS, IDEAS, PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS, IN THE SPECIFIC SUBJECT AREA WITH PROPERTY OF LANGUAGE AND GOOD ARTICULATION OF THOUGHT;
LEARNING ABILITY. ACQUISITION OF THE REFERENCES, TOOLS, LEARNING ABILITY NEEDED TO FURTHER ENRICH THE LEGAL KNOWLEDGES GAINED IN THIS TEACHING AND TO APPLY THESE SKILLS TO OTHER TEACHINGS OF UNIVERSITY COURSE;
Prerequisites
NO PROPEDEUTICITY.

IS RECOMMENDED THE KNOWLEDGE OF BASIC PHILOSOPHICAL, PRIVATE LAW, CONSTITUTIONAL AND CRIMINAL LAW SUBJECTS AND BASIC KNOWLEDGE OF CIVIC AND SOCIAL STRUCTURE.
Contents
THE PRINCIPLES OF THE SPECIAL SECTION: THE IMPACT OF CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES ON THE SPECIAL. THE SPECIAL AND RELATIONS WITH THE GENERAL PART OF THE CRIMINAL CODE. THE HYPERTROPHY OF THE PENAL SYSTEM. CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES AND INTERPRETATION OF THE SPECIAL RULES. THE REAL LEGAL CRITERION. THE SPECIAL SECTION BETWEEN CODING AND DECODING. THE ORGANIZATION OF THE SPECIAL BETWEEN CODE AND SPECIAL LAWS. THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE CASE AND THE ORGANIZATION TECHNIQUES. TYPES OF CRIMES. THE INDIVIDUAL CASES OF SPECIAL INCRIMINATING.
Teaching Methods
THE TEACHING WILL TAKE PLACE DURING THE FIRST SEMESTER AND WILL COMPREHEND 54 HOURS OF LESSON.

THE COURSE, WHICH IS NOT BINDING ATTEND, IS DIVIDED INTO LECTURES AND SEMINARIES FOR IN-DEPTH STUDY.
Verification of learning
ATTENDING STUDENTS
THE EXAM CONSISTS IN A FINAL ORAL INTERVIEW, IN WHICH WILL BE CONSIDERED THE ACTIVE PARTICIPATION DURING THE LESSONS AND THE CONCURRENT STUDY OF THE TEACHING MATERIAL PROVIDED, TOGETHER WITH THE NOTES OF THE LESSONS THAT ARE COMPLEMENTARY PART OF THE STUDY PROGRAM.

THE EVALUATION CRITERIA OF THE EXAM WILL BE:
1. ABILITY TO ARTICULATE A COMPLEX DISCOURSE;
2. ABILITY TO SPEAK CLEARLY AND WITH APPROPRIATE LEGAL LANGUAGE ;
3. ABILITY TO MANAGE LEGAL INSTITUTIONS ACCORDING TO THE NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONALS LEGAL SYSTEMS;
4. ABILITY TO CHOICE THE LEGAL DATE, STORING THOSE SIGNIFICANTS WITH METHODS;

THEREFORE, THE EVALUATION WILL TAKE INTO ACCOUNT AN EXPOSURE THAT STOPS AT THE MERE NOTIONISM OF THE DIDACTIC ACQUISITIONS MENTIONED ABOVE, ASKING INSTEAD AN EXPOSURE FULLY AWARE OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SYSTEMATIC METHOD.


NON-ATTENDING STUDENTS:

THE EXAM CONSISTS IN A FINAL ORAL INTERVIEW.

THE EVALUATION CRITERIA OF THE EXAM WILL BE:
1. ABILITY TO ARTICULATE A COMPLEX DISCOURSE;
2. ABILITY TO SPEAK CLEARLY AND WITH APPROPRIATE LEGAL LANGUAGE ;
3. ABILITY TO MANAGE LEGAL INSTITUTIONS ACCORDING TO THE NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONALS LEGAL SYSTEMS;
4. ABILITY TO CHOICE THE LEGAL DATE, STORING THOSE SIGNIFICANTS WITH METHODS;

THEREFORE, THE EVALUATION WILL TAKE INTO ACCOUNT AN EXPOSURE THAT STOPS AT THE MERE NOTIONISM OF THE DIDACTIC ACQUISITIONS MENTIONED ABOVE, ASKING INSTEAD AN EXPOSURE FULLY AWARE OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SYSTEMATIC METHOD.

THE FINAL MARK IS ATTRIBUTED IN THIRTIETHS. THE EXAM IS CONSIDERED PASSED WHEN THE MARK IS GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 18.
THE MINIMUM MARK (18) IS ATTRIBUTED WHEN THE STUDENT SHOWS FRAGMENTED KNOWLEDGE OF THE THEORETICAL CONTENT OR SHOWS LIMITED ABILITY TO LINK THE LEGISLATIVE REFERENCES TO THE CONTEXT OF THE STUDY.
THE MAXIMUM GRADE (30) IS ATTRIBUTED WHEN THE STUDENT SHOWS COMPLETE AND IN-DEPTH KNOWLEDGE OF THE THEORETICAL CONTENTS, EXPRESSING IT THROUGH CLEAR AND APPROPRIATE JURIDICAL LANGUAGE, OR SHOWS REMARKABLE ABILITY TO LINK THE LEGISLATIVE REFERENCES TO THE STUDY CONTEXT.
THE LAUD IS GIVEN WHEN THE STUDENT SHOWS SIGNIFICANT MASTERY OF THE THEORETICAL AND OPERATIONAL CONTENTS AND DEMONSTRATES ABILITY TO EXPOSE THE TOPICS WITH CONSIDERABLE MASTERY OF LANGUAGE AND AUTONOMOUS PROCESSING SKILLS EVEN IN CONTEXTS DIFFERENT FROM THOSE PROPOSED BY THE PROFESSOR.

Texts
LO STUDENTE POTRÀ OPTARE PER UNO DEI SEGUENTI PROGRAMMI.

1)DEI DELITTI CONTRO LA PERSONA
TESTO CONSIGLIATO: F. MANTOVANI, DIRITTO PENALE. PARTE SPECIALE, I, DELITTI CONTRO LA CAPITOLI II, V, VII, VIII - ULTIMA EDIZIONE - CEDAM PADOVA

2)DEI DELITTI CONTRO IL PATRIMONIO
TESTO CONSIGLIATO: G.FIANDACA-E.MUSCO, DIRITTO PENALE. PARTE SPECIALE, VOLUME 2 TOMO 2, I DELITTI CONTRO IL PATRIMONIO. ULTIMA EDIZIONE, ZANICHELLI, BOLOGNA

3)DEI DELITTI CONTRO L'ORDINE PUBBLICO
TESTO CONSIGLIATO: G. FORNASARI-S. RIONDATO (A CURA DI), REATI CONTRO L'ORDINE PUBBLICO, GIAPPICHELLI, TORINO 2017
E
TESTO CONSIGLIATO: M. GALLO, DIRITTO PENALE ITALIANO. APPUNTI DI PARTE SPECIALE: I DELITTI CONTRO LA PERSONALITÀ DELLO STATO. LO STATO SI RACCONTA,
GIAPPICHELLI, TORINO, 2021

4)DELITTI CONTRO L'AMBIENTE
TESTO CONSIGLIATO: M. TELESCA, LA TUTELA PENALE DELLAMBIENTE. I PROFILI PROBLEMATICI DELLA LEGGE N. 68/2015, SECONDA EDIZIONE GIAPPICHELLI, TORINO 2021

5)DEI DELITTI CONTRO LA PUBBLICA AMMINISTRAZIONE
TESTO CONSIGLIATO: S.FIORE-G. AMARELLI, I DELITTI DEI PUBBLICI UFFICIALI CONTRO LA PUBBLICA AMMINISTRAZIONE, UTET, TORINO 2018.

6) DEI DELITTI CONTRO L'AMMINISTRAZIONE DELLA GIUSTIZIA
TESTO CONSIGLIATO: REATI CONTRO LAMMINISTRAZIONE DELLA GIUSTIZIA, A CURA DI G. FORNASARI-S. RIONDATO. SECONDA EDIZIONE, GIAPPICHELLI, TORINO 2017 (DA PAG. 1 A PAG. 254 E DA PAG. 293 A PAG. 352).

AL TESTO RELATIVO AL PROGRAMMA PRESCELTO VA AGGIUNTO:
E. LO MONTE,ART. 613-TER C.P. “DIFFUSIONE ILLECITA DI IMMAGINI O VIDEO SESSUALMENTE ESPLICITI”. TRA BUONI PROPOSITI, DENEGATO ‘DIRITTO ALL’OBLIO’ E MORTI ‘SOCIAL’, GIAPPICHELLI, TORINO, 2021
More Information
STUDENTS AFTER THE COURSE DISCOVERED DIDACTIC MATERIALS IN SUBSTITUTION OF SOME SUBJECTS OF RECOMMENDED TEXTS
  BETA VERSION Data source ESSE3 [Ultima Sincronizzazione: 2022-11-30]