Anna MALOMO | FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND BIOLAW
Anna MALOMO FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND BIOLAW
cod. 0160100396
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND BIOLAW
| 0160100396 | |
| DIPARTIMENTO DI SCIENZE GIURIDICHE (SCUOLA DI GIURISPRUDENZA) | |
| EQF7 | |
| LAW | |
| 2018/2019 |
| YEAR OF DIDACTIC SYSTEM 2012 | |
| PRIMO SEMESTRE |
| SSD | CFU | HOURS | ACTIVITY | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IUS/01 | 8 | 72 | LESSONS |
| Objectives | |
|---|---|
| KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITY OF COMPREHENSION: THE TRAINING-ORIENTED OBJECTIVE OF “THE HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE BIO-LAW” TEACHING IS THE ANALYSIS OF THE LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE ISSUES OF MAJOR SIGNIFICANCE IN BIOETHICS, FROM A METHODOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE AIMED AT PROMOTING THE FULLEST POSSIBLE EFFECT TO PROMOTE THE WORTH OF HUMAN BEING AND HIS DIGNITY. IN THE SINGLE LEGISLATIVE SYSTEM, THE NEED FOR PROMOTING AND DEFENDING THE INVIOLABLE RIGHTS APPEARS TO BE A PRIORITY WHEN DEALING WITH A SERIES OF ISSUES AND QUESTIONS CONCERNING BOTH THE SUBJECTIVE AND EXISTENTIAL SITUATIONS, AND THE LEGAL ARRANGEMENTS TRADITIONALLY CHARACTERIZED BY A RELATION WITH THE OWNERSHIP’S RIGHTS. ABILITY OF APPLY KNOWLEDGE AND COMPREHENSION: STUDENTS WILL MATURE THE ABILITY OF APPLY THE KNOWLEDGE LEARNT IN THEORY TO CONCRETE SITUATIONS AND WILL BE ABLE TO COMBINE THEM TO OTHER SPECIFIC KNOWLEDGE IN THE STUDY. |
| Prerequisites | |
|---|---|
| NO |
| Contents | |
|---|---|
| THE OBJECTIVES OF THE TEACHING ARE: CONSTITUTIONAL PERSONALISM AND SOLIDARITY (16 HOURS OF LECTURES); HUMAN RIGHTS AND MARKET (10 HOURS OF LECTURES); SUBJECTIVE AND EXISTENTIAL CONDITIONS (16 HOURS OF LECTURES); BEGINNING OF THE HUMAN LIFE (4 HOURS OF LECTURES); LEGAL PERSONALITY OF THE CONCEIVED (4 HOURS OF LECTURES); PROTECTION OF THE HUMAN EMBRYO (4 HOURS OF LECTURES); PATENTABILITY OF THE HUMAN LIVE (2 HOURS OF LECTURES); MEDICALLY ASSISTED PROCREATION (4 HOURS OF LECTURES); ULTRA-SENSITIVE DATA PROTECTION (2 HOURS OF LECTURES); END OF THE HUMAN LIFE (6 HOURS OF LECTURES); ORGAN DONATION AND TRANSPLANTATION (2 HOURS OF LECTURES); TISSUE BANKS (2 HOURS OF LECTURES). |
| Teaching Methods | |
|---|---|
| THE TEACHING PROVIDES LONG LEARNING OF 72 HOURS OF LENGTH (8 CFU), WITH SEMINARS, EXERCISES AND DISCUSSION ON CASE LAW. |
| Verification of learning | |
|---|---|
| ACHIEVING THE OBJECTIVES OF TEACHING IS CERTIFIED BY EXAMINATION WITH EVALUATION OF TIRTHY/30. FOR STUDENTS FOLLOWING THE LESSONS: ONE ORAL EXAM RELATIVELY TO ONE PART OF THE PROGRAM AT THE END OF THE LESSONS AND ONE ORAL FINAL EXAMINATION RELATIVELY TO THE REMAINING PART OF THE PROGRAM. FOR STUDENTS NOT FOLLOWING THE LESSONS ONE ORAL FINAL EXAMINATION. THE LEARNING OUTCOMES THAT WILL BE TESTED ARE: ORAL INTERMEDIATE TEST, ORAL FINAL EXAMINATIONS ON: - INDEPENDENT JUDGEMENT: ABILITY TO ANALYZE AND EVALUATE CIRCUMSTANCES AND SITUATIONS IN WHICH THE ADDRESSED TOPICS; - COMMUNICATION SKILLS: ABILITY TO COMMUNICATE THE ACQUIRED KNOWLEDGE, DISCUSSING IN A CLEAR, EFFECTIVE AND INCISIVE MANNER; - LEARNING SKILLS: ABILITY TO DEVELOP APPROPRIATE CAPABILITIES TO PERCEIVE AND INTERPRET THE LEGISLATIVE SOURCES ABOUT HUMAN RIGHTS AND BIO-LAW. |
| Texts | |
|---|---|
| A) P. PERLINGIERI, IL DIRITTO CIVILE NELLA LEGALITÀ COSTITUZIONALE SECONDO IL SISTEMA ITALO-COMUNITARIO DELLE FONTI, ESI, NAPOLI, 2006, INVOLVING THE CHAPTERS IX (PERSONA E FORMAZIONI SOCIALI) AND X (MERCATO SOLIDARIETÀ E DIRITTI UMANI); P. PERLINGIERI, I PRINCÌPI GIURIDICI TRA PREGIUDIZI, DIFFIDENZA E CONSERVATORISMO, IN ANNALI DELLA SISDIC, ESI NAPOLI, 2017, PP. 1-24; P. PERLINGIERI, LIBERTÀ RELIGIOSA, PRINCIPIO DI DIFFERENZIAZIONE E ORDINE PUBBLICO, IN DIR. SUCC. FAM., 2017, 1, PP. 165-185;P. PERLINGIERI, RELAZIONE CONCLUSIVA, IN R. PANE, FAMIGLIE E SUCCESSIONI TRA LIBERTÀ E SOLIDARIETÀ, ESI, NAPOLI 2017, PP. 243-256; B) ONLY 5 ESSAYS AMONG THE FOLLOWING, AT THE CHOICE OF THE STUDENT: - F.D. BUSNELLI, PERSONA UMANA E DILEMMI DELLA BIOETICA: COME RIPENSARE LO STATUTO DELLA SOGGETTIVITÀ, IN DIRITTI UMANI E DIRITTO INTERNAZIONALE, 2007 FASC. 2, PP. 245-262; - G. OPPO, L’INIZIO DELLA VITA UMANA, IN RIVISTA DI DIRITTO CIVILE, 1982, I, PP. 499-529 - F.D. BUSNELLI, L’INIZIO DELLA VITA UMANA, IN RIVISTA DI DIRITTO CIVILE, 2004, I, PP. 533-568 - F. PARENTE, LA “BIOGIURIDICITÀ” DELLA VITA NASCENTE TRA “LIBERTÀ” DELLA RICERCA BIOMEDICA E “DINAMISMO” DELLA TUTELA DEI VALORI ESISTENZIALI DELL’UOMO, IN RASS. DIR. CIV., 2009, PP. 440-471 - D. CARUSI, NON SOLO PROCREAZIONE ASSISTITA: IL PRINCIPIO DI PARI DIGNITÀ E LA COSTITUZIONE MINACCIATA, IN POLITICA DEL DIRITTO, 2007 FASC. 3, PP. 413-450 - G. CARAPEZZA FIGLIA, TUTELA DELL’EMBRIONE E DIVIETO DI BREVETTABILITÀ: UN CASO DI ASSIOLOGIA DIRIMENTE NELL’ERMENEUTICA DELLA CORTE DI GIUSTIZIA, IN DIR. FAM., 2012, 1, P. 20 SS. FERRANDO G., COME D’AUTUNNO SUGLI ALBERI LE FOGLIE - LA LEGGE N. 40 PERDE ANCHE IL DIVIETO DI DIAGNOSI PREIMPIANTO (NOTA A CORTE COST., 5 GIUGNO 2015, N. 96, P. M. C.), NUOVA GIUR. CIV., 2015, II, PAG. 582 SS. - F.D. BUSNELLI, PROBLEMI GIURIDICI DI FINE VITA TRA NATURA E ARTIFICIO, IN RIV. DIR. CIV., 2011, I, PP. 153-172 13) A. GORASSINI, APPUNTI SPARSI SUL C.D. TESTAMENTO BIOLOGICO, IN RASS. DIR. CIV., 2011, PP. 41-62 - A. MALOMO, VOCE BANCHE DI TESSUTI, IN E. SGRECCIA E A. TARANTINO (A CURA DI), ENCICLOPEDIA DI BIOETICA E SCIENZA GIURIDICA, ESI, NAPOLI, 2010, I, PP. 44-70; - A. MALOMO, PERDITA DELLA VITA E RIPARAZIONE INTEGRALE, IN DIR. SUCC. FAM., 2015, PAG. 383 SS. |
| More Information | |
|---|---|
| ADDITIONAL EDUCATIONAL MATERIAL WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE TEACHER: JUDGEMENTS, POWER POINT PRESENTATIONS. |
BETA VERSION Data source ESSE3 [Ultima Sincronizzazione: 2019-10-21]
