Civil law

Federica LAZZARELLI Civil law

0160100010
DIPARTIMENTO DI SCIENZE GIURIDICHE (SCUOLA DI GIURISPRUDENZA)
EQF7
LAW
2023/2024

OBBLIGATORIO
YEAR OF COURSE 3
YEAR OF DIDACTIC SYSTEM 2012
FULL ACADEMIC YEAR
CFUHOURSACTIVITY
12108LESSONS


Objectives
(I SEMESTER) THE COURSE DEALS WITH THE STUDY OF CIVIL LAW IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL LEGALITY ACCORDING TO THE ITALIAN-EUROPEAN SYSTEM OF SOURCES. PARTICULAR ATTENTION DESERVES THE THEORY OF SOURCES AND INTERPRETATION OF LAW AS A SINGLE PROBLEM, CONFIGURING THE HERMENEUTIC CANONS IN FUNCTION OF APPLICATION AND CONTROL OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE PRINCIPLES IDENTIFYING THE CONSTITUTIONAL LEGALITY.

(II SEMESTER) "DRITTWIRKUNG: CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES AND RELATIONS BETWEEN PRIVATE INDIVIDUALS. A PATH IN THE GERMAN DOCTRINE". WILL BE ANALYZED, IN DETAIL, THE HISTORICAL AND POLITICAL PREMISES, THE CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE IN RELATION TO PRIVATE LAW, THE DISCURSIVE GUARANTEES AS A LENS OF INVESTIGATION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS.
Prerequisites
PASSING THE INSTITUTIONS OF PRIVATE LAW EXAM.
Contents
THE GERMAN EXPERIENCE WITH THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CIVIL AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW HAS HAD A PROFOUND IMPACT ON LEGAL CULTURE IN EUROPE AND BEYOND. DEBATES AND HEATED CONTROVERSIES HAVE REVOLVED AROUND THE QUESTION OF WHETHER THE CONSTITUTION IS DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY APPLICABLE TO CIVIL LAW RELATIONSHIPS. THE DRITTWIRKUNG OF CONSTITUTIONAL FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IS THE FORTUNATE FORMULA WITH WHICH THIS EXPERIENCE HAS BECOME GENERALLY KNOWN AND STUDIED. THE STUDY, THEREFORE, TURNS IN THE DIRECTION OF A CAREFUL RECONSTRUCTION, IN A REASONED PATH, OF THE MAIN POSITIONS THAT FROM THE FIFTIES OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY UNTIL MORE RECENT TIMES, HAVE ADDRESSED THE PROBLEM, WITH SOLUTIONS ALSO CONSIDERABLY DIVERGENT.
Teaching Methods
THE COURSE HAS A DURATION OF 108 HOURS OF LECTURES AND IS DIVIDED INTO FRONTAL TEACHING, SEMINARS AND ANALYSIS OF CASE LAW.
Verification of learning
FINAL ORAL EXAM LASTING ABOUT 40 MINUTES WITH EVALUATION IN THIRTIETHS.

EVALUATION CRITERIA OF THE EXAM WILL BE:
1) ABILITY TO CRITICALLY ANALYZE AND ELABORATE ON THE TOPICS COVERED;

2) ABILITY TO EXPRESS ONESELF WITH CLARITY AND PROPERTY OF LANGUAGE;

3) ABILITY TO FRAME SYSTEMATIC AND AXIOLOGICAL NORMS AND INSTITUTIONS;

4) ABILITY TO DEVELOP REASONING WITH ADEQUATE METHODOLOGICAL RIGOR.

THE MINIMUM LEVEL OF EVALUATION (18/30) IS ASSIGNED WHEN THE STUDENT HAS A FRAGMENTARY KNOWLEDGE OR SHOWS A LIMITED ABILITY TO SYSTEMATICALLY AND AXIOLOGICALLY FRAME THEORETICAL CONTENT, A REDUCED ORIENTATION WITH RESPECT TO THE DOCTRINE AND JURISPRUDENCE, A LIMITED COMMAND OF TECHNICAL LANGUAGE AND LEGAL ARGUMENTATION, LITTLE METHODOLOGICAL AWARENESS.


THE MAXIMUM LEVEL (30/30) IS AWARDED WHEN THE STUDENT DEMONSTRATES A COMPLETE AND THOROUGH KNOWLEDGE, A REMARKABLE ABILITY TO SYSTEMATICALLY AND AXIOLOGICALLY FRAME THE THEORETICAL CONTENT, A REMARKABLE ABILITY TO ORIENT WITH RESPECT TO THE ADDRESSES OF DOCTRINE AND JURISPRUDENCE AND AWARENESS IN THE ANALYSIS OF JURISPRUDENTIAL SOLUTIONS, EXCELLENT COMMAND OF TECHNICAL LANGUAGE AND LEGAL ARGUMENTATION, METHODOLOGICAL AWARENESS.


THE PRAISE IS AWARDED WHEN THE CANDIDATE DEMONSTRATES VALUABLE MASTERY OF THEORETICAL CONTENT, OPERATIONAL, SYSTEMATIC, METHODOLOGICAL AND TO BE ABLE TO PRESENT THE ARGUMENTS WITH CONSIDERABLE TECHNICAL LANGUAGE PROPERTY AND CONSIDERABLE MASTERY OF LEGAL ARGUMENTATION, ABILITY TO DEVELOP AUTONOMOUSLY EVEN IN CONTEXTS OTHER THAN THOSE PROPOSED BY THE TEACHER.
Texts
P. PERLINGIERI, IL DIRITTO CIVILE NELLA LEGALITÀ COSTITUZIONALE SECONDO IL SISTEMA ITALO-EUROPEO DELLE FONTI- VOL. II - FONTI E INTERPRETAZIONE, ESI, 2020.

P. FEMIA (A CURA DI), DRITTWIRKUNG. PRINCIPI COSTITUZIONALI E RAPPORTI TRA PRIVATI, ESI, 2018. CON RIGUARDO AL TESTO, AI FINI DELLA PREPARAZIONE DELL'ESAME, È RICHIESTA LA CONOSCENZA DEI SEGUENTI SAGGI:
PASQUALE FEMIA, DRITTWIRKUNG. UNA DOGMATICA DI TRANSIZIONE;
ULRICH PREUSS, LA DOTTRINA TEDESCA DELLA DRITTWIRKUNG ED IL SUO SFONDO SOCIO-POLITICO;
HANS-PETER HAFERKAMP, 1958: LA SENTENZA LÜTH DEL BUNDESVERFASSUNGSGERICHT;
CLAUS-WILHELM CANARIS, DIRITTI FONDAMENTALI E DIRITTO PRIVATO;
GUNTHER TEUBNER, UN CASO DI CORRUZIONE STRUTTURALE? LA FIDEIUSSIONE DEI FAMILIARI NELLA COLLISIONE DI LOGICHE D’AZIONE INCOMPATIBILI (BVERFGE 89, 214 SS.);
GUNTHER TEUBNER, I RAPPORTI PRECARI TRA DIRITTO E TEORIA SOCIALE;
DECISIONI DEL BUNDESVERFASSUNGSGERICHT: “LÜTH” (15 GENNAIO 1958); “HANDELSVERTRETER” (7 FEBBRAIO 1990); “BÜRGSCHAFT” (19 OTTOBRE 1993).
More Information
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
VINCENZA.CONTE@UNICAMPANIA.IT
Lessons Timetable

  BETA VERSION Data source ESSE3 [Ultima Sincronizzazione: 2024-02-29]