COMPARATIVE LAW

Marcello D'AMBROSIO COMPARATIVE LAW

1212200038
DIPARTIMENTO DI SCIENZE ECONOMICHE E STATISTICHE
EQF6
ADMINISTRATION AND ORGANIZATION
2018/2019

YEAR OF DIDACTIC SYSTEM 2016
SECONDO SEMESTRE
CFUHOURSACTIVITY
530LESSONS
Objectives
KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING: STUDENTS ARE ACQUAINTED WITH A COMPLETE KNOWLEDGE OF PRIVATE LAW FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES AND RULES, THROUGHOUT A JURISPRUDENTIAL AND CASE LAW APPROACH AND PROBLEMATIC METHOD. THE COURSE PROVIDES STUDENTS WITH CONCEPTUAL INSTRUMENTS FUNCTIONAL AND HIGH CRITICAL CAPACITY RELATED NOT ONLY TO THE CIVIL LAW ISSUES BUT ALSO TO THE OTHER FIELDS OF LAW. APPLYING KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING: STUDENTS WILL HAVE THE CAPACITY TO APPLY THEORETICAL KNOWLEDGE TO CONCRETE SITUATIONS AND TO COMBINE IT WITH THE SPECIFIC CONCEPTS THAT THEY WILL LEARN DURING THEIR FURTHER STUDIES. STUDENTS WILL HAVE THE CAPACITY TO REPRESENT AND DISCUSS EFFECTIVELY THE RESULTS OF THEIR WORK, USING LITERATURE AND NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL ON-LINE DATA BASES.
Prerequisites
THE PROGRAM HAS BEEN DRAWN UP IN COORDINATION WITH PROGRAMS OF OTHER LEGAL, ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS SUBJECTS
Contents
FUNCTION OF COMPARATIVE PRIVATE LAW
COMPARATIVE METHOD
COMMON LAW AND CIVIL LAW
ENGLISH MODEL
AMERICAN MODEL
FRENCH MODEL
GERMAN MODEL
EUROPEAN PRIVATE LAW
Teaching Methods
LECTURES, SEMINARS ALSO HELD BY LECTURERS FROM FOREIGN UNIVERSITIES AND PRACTITIONERS, EXERCISES AND DISCUSSION ON CASE LAW.
Verification of learning
THE ACHIEVEMENT OF THE TEACHING GOALS IS VERIFIED WITH AN EVALUATION TEST IN THIRTIETHS. THE EVALUATION AIMS TO ASCERTAIN THE LEVEL OF UNDERSTANDING AND KNOWLEDGE ACHIEVED BY THE STUDENT ON THE CONTENTS INDICATED IN THE PROGRAM, HIS MASTERY OF THE METHODOLOGICAL TOOLS, AS WELL AS HIS ABILITY TO APPLY KNOWLEDGE TO SOLVE THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL PROBLEMS.
THE EXAM FORESEES AN ORAL TEST IN WHICH WILL BE POSSIBLE QUESTIONS OPEN WITH OPEN ANSWER ON THE ENTIRE TEACHING PROGRAM. THE ORAL TEST WILL TAKE PLACE IN THE DATES PROVIDED BY THE CALENDAR AND HAS A DURATION OF 30 MINUTES. THE TEST IS INTENDED TO BE EXCEEDED WITH A MINIMUM OF 18/30.
THE MAXIMUM EVALUATION OF 30/30 IS AWARDED WHEN THE STUDENT DEMONSTRATES A COMPLETE AND IN-DEPTH KNOWLEDGE OF THE THEORETICAL CONTENTS, AS WELL AS AN EXCELLENT ABILITY TO LINK THE LEGISLATIVE REFERENCES TO THE STUDY CONTEXT. PRAISE IS GIVEN WHEN THE STUDENT SHOWS A SIGNIFICANT MASTERY OF THE THEORETICAL AND OPERATIONAL CONTENT, PRESENTING THE TOPICS WITH CONSIDERABLE OWNERSHIP OF LANGUAGE AND AUTONOMOUS PROCESSING SKILLS EVEN IN CONTEXTS DIFFERENT FROM THOSE PROPOSED BY THE PROFESSOR.
Texts
G. AJANI, D. FRANCAVILLA, B. PASA, DIRITTO COMPARATO. LEZIONI E MATERIALI, TORINO, GIAPPICHELLI, LATEST ED.
V. VARANO, V. BARSOTTI, LA TRADIZIONE GIURIDICA OCCIDENTALE. TESTO E MATERIALI PER UN CONFRONTO CIVIL LAW COMMON LAW, TORINO, GIAPPICHELLI, LATEST ED.
A CANDIAN. E A. GAMBARO (A CURA DI), CASI E MATERIALI PER UN CORSO DI DIRITTO PRIVATO COMPARATO. LE TRADIZIONI DI COMMON LAW E CIVIL LAW, TORINO, GIAPPICHELLI, LATEST ED.
More Information
SUGGESTED READINGS
CASE LAW, SLIDES
  BETA VERSION Data source ESSE3 [Ultima Sincronizzazione: 2019-10-21]