Francesco BUONOMENNA | EUROPEAN UNION LAW AND INSTITUTIONS
Francesco BUONOMENNA EUROPEAN UNION LAW AND INSTITUTIONS
cod. 1212100062
EUROPEAN UNION LAW AND INSTITUTIONS
1212100062 | |
DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL AND COMMUNICATION SCIENCES | |
EQF6 | |
POLITICAL AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS SCIENCE | |
2024/2025 |
YEAR OF COURSE 3 | |
YEAR OF DIDACTIC SYSTEM 2019 | |
SPRING SEMESTER |
SSD | CFU | HOURS | ACTIVITY | |
---|---|---|---|---|
IUS/14 | 6 | 40 | LESSONS |
Objectives | |
---|---|
THE COURSE AIMS TO PROVIDE STUDENTS WITH THE TOOLS NECESSARY FOR THE BASIC KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROCESS OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION, FROM THE ORIGINS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES TO THE CURRENT EUROPEAN UNION, FOCUSING ON THE ORIGINAL CHOICE OF LEGAL MODEL AND THE EFFECTS THAT DERIVE FROM IT ON THE SYSTEM OF COMPETENCES. ACQUIRED KNOWLEDGE BY STUDENTS WILL COVER: - THE MAIN ELEMENTS OF THE INTEGRATION PROCESS;- THE INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE; - THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK;- PROCEDURES FOR MONITORING AND VERIFYING COMPLIANCE WITH EU LAW. AT THE END OF THE COURSE, STUDENTS WILL HAVE ACQUIRED THE THEORETICAL BASES THAT WILL ALLOW THEM TO: - ORIENT THEMSELVES ON THE MAIN ISSUES REGARDING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EUROPEAN UNION LAW AND STATE LAW; - UNDERSTAND THE LEGAL SYSTEM IN ITS DIFFERENT REPRESENTATIONS; - ANALYSE THE REASONS FOR LEGAL ACTS AND THE ANALYSIS OF CASE LAW, ALSO WITH CRITICAL TOOLS.THE STUDENT WILL BE ABLE TO:- TO CHOOSE AMONG THE DIFFERENT THEORIES STUDIED THE MOST USEFUL FOR THE INTERPRETATION AND SOLUTION OF CONCRETE CASE STUDIES; -TO ANALYZE THE SOURCES AND CASE HISTORIES TO DETERMINE AUTONOMOUS JUDGMENTS WITH REFLECTIONS ON THE INTEGRATION PROCESS; - APPLY ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGIES FOR AN IN-DEPTH KNOWLEDGE OF THE RELATIONS BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE MEMBER STATESTHE STUDENT WILL BE ABLE TO: TO USE APPROPRIATE VOCABULARY WHEN DISCUSSING ISSUES AND CONCRETE CASES; - TO COMMUNICATE INFORMATION, IDEAS, PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS TO SPECIALIST AND NON-SPECIALIST INTERLOCUTORS; -TO CLEARLY COMMUNICATE THEIR CONCLUSIONS AND KNOWLEDGE TO SPECIALIST AND NON-SPECIALIST INTERLOCUTORSTHE STUDENT WILL BE ABLE TO:- DEVELOP INDEPENDENT STUDY SKILLS; - DEVELOP THE ABILITY TO ASK QUESTIONS ABOUT THE EFFECTS OF THE CHOICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION MODEL; -DEMONSTRATE THE ABILITY TO SEARCH WITH THE USE OF TRADITIONAL BIBLIOGRAPHIC TOOLS AND COMPUTER RESOURCES FOR ANALYSIS AND ARCHIVING. |
Prerequisites | |
---|---|
NO PREREQUISITES |
Contents | |
---|---|
THE ORIGIN OF THE EUROPEAN INTEGRATION PROCESS; PRINCIPLES; THE INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE; THE SYSTEM OF SOURCES; PROCEDURES FOR ADOPTION OF ACTS; THE JURISDICTIONAL PROTECTION SYSTEM; THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EUROPEAN UNION AND NATIONAL LAWS. |
Teaching Methods | |
---|---|
THE TEACHING COURSE CONSISTS OF 40HOURS OF LECTURES. PRACTICAL EXERCISES ARE PROVIDED, AS WELL AS SIMULATION GAMES AND TRAINING ACTIVITIES ON A SEMINAR BASIS. AN INTERACTIVE METHOD WILL BE ADOPTED, IN ORDER TO AROUSE THE INTEREST OF STUDENTS AS REGARDS THE SUBJECT AND TO FOSTER THE CRITICAL ACQUISITION OF CONTENTS. |
Verification of learning | |
---|---|
FOR THE STUDENTS ATTENDING LECTURES: -GROUP DISCUSSIONS GUIDED BY THE TEACHER, ABOUT THE CONTENTS OF THE COURSE ALSO FOR ENCOURAGING OCCASIONS OF SELF-ASSESSMENT BY STUDENTS THEMSELVES; -THE POSSIBILITY OF UNDERGOING AN ORAL TEST BETWEEN LECTURES ABOUT A PART OF THE PROGRAM WHICH, IN CASE IT RESULTS TO BE POSITIVE, WILL NOT ASSESSED ANYMORE; - FINAL ORAL EXAM, THROUGH QUESTIONS DESIGNED TO TEST KNOWLEDGE OF TEACHING CONTENT. FOR THE STUDENTS NOT ATTENDING LECTURES: - FINAL ORAL EXAM, THROUGH QUESTIONS DESIGNED TO TEST KNOWLEDGE OF TEACHING CONTENT. THE TESTING OF THE EDUCATIONAL RESULTS CONCERNING THE GENERAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE SUBJECT IS BASED ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF SKILLS FOR BETTER LEARNING THE ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF THE SUBJECT, ALSO FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF THE USE OF IT FOR THE JOB WORLD, THE DEEPENING OF CRITICAL-RECONSTRUCTION SKILLS AS REGARDS THE SUBJECT UNDER DISCUSSION AND ITS MOST CRUCIAL ASPECTS AS WELL AS THE ABILITY OF COMMUNICATING THE NOTIONS ACQUIRED, WITH A SELF-CONFIDENT SPEECH AND TERMINOLOGICAL ACCURACY. THE MINIMUM EVALUATION LEVEL (18) WILL BE ASSIGNED IF THE STUDENT SHOWS A FRAGMENTAL KNOWLEDGE AND A LITTLE DEEPENING OF THEORETICAL CONTENT OR A LIMITED CAPACITY TO CONNECT THE NORMATIVE AND JURISPRUDENTIAL REFERENCES TO THE STUDY CONTEXT. THE MAXIMUM LEVEL OF EVALUATION (30) WILL BE GRANTED IF THE STUDENT SHOWS A COMPLETE AND DEEPENING KNOWLEDGE OF THEORETICAL CONTENTS OR SHOWS A NOTABLE CAPACITY TO LINK THE NORMATIVE AND JURISPRUDENTIAL REFERENCES TO THE STUDY CONTEXT. LA PRAISE WILL BE GRANTED TO CANDIDATES WHO EXHIBIT SIGNIFICANT MASTERY OF THEORETICAL AND OPERATIVE CONTENT AND KNOW TO ARGUE WITH REMARKABLE LANGUAGE PROPERTIES AND ABILITY OF AUTONOMOUS PROCESSING ALSO IN DIFFERENT CONTEXTS FROM THOSE PROPOSED BY THE PROFESSOR. |
Texts | |
---|---|
ALTERNATIVELY RECOMMENDED: ANNA LUCIA VALVO, ISTITUZIONI DI DIRITTO ELL'UNIONE EUROPEA, GIAPPICHELLI, TORINO, 2021; UGO VILLANI, ISTITUZIONI DI DIRITTO DELL'UNIONE EUROPEA, CACUCCI, BARI, 2024, |
More Information | |
---|---|
THE TEXT OF THE TREATY OF LISBON IS RECOMMENDED FOR THE STUDY |
BETA VERSION Data source ESSE3 [Ultima Sincronizzazione: 2024-11-18]