2. Professors
  3. COSENTINO Carla
  4. Teaching

GLOBAL LAW, SUSTAINABILITY AND NEW TECHNOLOGIES

Carla COSENTINO GLOBAL LAW, SUSTAINABILITY AND NEW TECHNOLOGIES

0112100009
DEPARTMENT OF LAW
EQF6
BUSINESS AND NEW TECHNOLOGIES LAWYER
2024/2025

OBBLIGATORIO
YEAR OF COURSE 2
YEAR OF DIDACTIC SYSTEM 2020
SPRING SEMESTER
CFUHOURSACTIVITY
636LESSONS
CARLA COSENTINO T Curriculum
Objectives
THE COURSE AIMS TO PROVIDE AN INSTITUTIONAL STUDY PERSPECTIVE OF COMPARATIVE LEGAL SYSTEMS WHICH FOCUSES ON THE PROCESSES OF SUPRANNATIONAL INTEGRATION AND ON THE PHENOMENON OF GLOBALIZATION.
AFTER A FIRST INTRODUCTORY PART RELATING TO THE RELEVANT LEGAL SYSTEMS IN TODAY'S SOCIAL-ECONOMIC CONTEXT, THE COURSE WILL FOCUS ON SOME MACRO-AREAS INVESTED BY THE PHENOMENON OF GLOBALIZATION WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE TOPICS OF SUSTAINABILITY (IN THE LAW OF PROPERTY, CONTRACT, AND CIVIL LIABILITY) AND DIGITALIZATION.
AT THE END OF THE COURSE, THE STUDENT WILL REACH A LEVEL OF GENERAL UNDERSTANDING ON THE ROLE OF LAW AS A BALANCING TOOL BETWEEN TECHNICAL PROGRESS AND SUSTAINABILITY OF ECONOMIC CHOICES IMPLEMENTED IN THE GLOBAL SCOPE, WITHIN THE PROTECTION OF FUNDAMENTAL PERSONAL RIGHTS AND ESSENTIAL NECESSITY TO PROMOTE ETHICS OF RESPONSIBILITY TOWARDS FUTURE GENERATIONS
THE COURSE WILL ALLOW THE ACQUISITION OF AN ANALYTICAL AND CRITICAL APPROACH TO LEGAL DATA, ESSENTIAL FOR THE DECODING OF THE DIFFERENT SOURCES THAT OPERATE IN THE VARIOUS ORDERS IN THE CURRENT HISTORICAL CONTEXT. IT WILL ALSO PROVIDE SPECIFIC SKILLS ON THE MACRO-TOPICS OF SUSTAINABILITY AND DIGITAL.
THE COURSE WILL PROVIDE STUDENTS WITH A GREATER CRITICAL AND ANALYTICAL ABILITY WHICH IS NOT LIMITED TO THE OBJECT OF STUDY, BUT WHICH IS AIMED AT ENHANCEMENT OF THE FACULTIES OF INTERPRETATION, JUDGMENT AND EVALUATION.
THE STUDENT WILL BE ABLE TO DEVELOP GREATER LANGUAGE PROPERTY AND TO REFINE HIS ABILITY TO TECHNICAL-LEGAL EXPRESSION.
THE STUDENT WILL BE ABLE TO:
- USE TRADITIONAL BIBLIOGRAPHICAL TOOLS AND IT RESOURCES FOR ANALYSIS AND ARCHIVING;
- CARRY OUT RESEARCH, UNDERSTAND AND INTERPRET LAW TEXTS SUCH AS CODES, LAWS AND JUDGMENTS.
Prerequisites
AS PREREQUISITE IS RECOMMENDED KNOWLEDGE, WRITTEN AND ORAL LANGUAGE OF AT LEAST ONE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION WITH RESPECT ALSO TO DISCIPLINARY LEXICONS.
Contents
INTRODUCTION TO COMPARATIVE LAW
LEGAL COMPARISON AND THE SOURCES OF LAW.
THE TRADITION OF CIVIL LAW AND THE ERA OF CODIFICATIONS.
THE COMMON LAW MODEL. THE ORIGINS AND EVOLUTION IN ENGLAND AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
COMMON GOODS AND PROPERTY FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF SUSTAINABILITY.
THE CONTRACT BETWEEN RECODING AND NEW FUNCTIONS (THE ECOLOGICAL CONTRACT)
CIVIL RESPONSIBILITY AND SUSTAINABILITY (GREENWASHING)
PRIVACY AND CIRCULATION OF DATA
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND REGULATION ATTEMPTS
Teaching Methods
THE COURSE FEATURING PRIMARILY FOR AN APPROACH TO STIMULATE THE FACE OF CRITICAL SKILLS AND AUTONOMY OF STUDENTS 'JUDGEMENT. THE ADMINISTRATION OF GENERAL CONCEPTS IS ACCOMPANIED BY PERIODIC TEACHER INTERACTION WITH THE TRAINEES IN ORDER TO ANALYZE THE LEARNING LEVEL REACHED AND, IF NECESSARY, TO TAKE THE NECESSARY REMEDIES. TO ACHIEVE THESE OBJECTIVES PRIORITY MUST BE GIVEN TO METHODOLOGIC AND SYSTEMATIC CONTENTS RESPECT TO THE QUANTITY OF NOTIONS . THE COURSE IS ALSO ASSOCIATED WITH THE ORGANISATION OF SEMINARS, WORKSHOPS AND EXERCISES THAT ALLOW THE STUDENT TO APPLY THE KNOWLEDGE LEARNED AND TO CHECK HIS SKILLS.
Verification of learning
THE ACHIEVEMENT OF THE TEACHING GOALS IS VERIFIED WITH AN EVALUATION TEST IN THIRTIETHS. THE EVALUATION AIMS TO ASCERTAIN THE LEVEL OF UNDERSTANDING AND KNOWLEDGE ACHIEVED BY THE STUDENT, HIS MASTERY OF THE METHODOLOGICAL TOOLS, AS WELL AS HIS ABILITY TO APPLY KNOWLEDGE TO SOLVE THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL PROBLEMS.ORAL EXAMINATION. DURING THE COURSE THERE WILL BE A WRITTEN EXERCISE. THE EVALUATION CRITERIA ARE: 1) CAPACITY TO EXPRESS WITH CLARITY AND WITH ADEQUATE USE OF LEGAL TERMINOLOGY; 2) SYSTEM CAPACITY OF LEGAL REASONING SYSTEM; 3) CAPACITY TO SELECT DATA, SUSTAINING THE MOST SIGNIFICANT PROFILES; 4) THE DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY OF A LEGAL REASON FOR THE REMOVAL OF DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE INFERENCE. THE MAXIMUM EVALUATION OF 30/30 IS AWARDED WHEN THE STUDENT DEMONSTRATES A COMPLETE AND IN-DEPTH KNOWLEDGE OF THE THEORETICAL CONTENTS, AS WELL AS AN EXCELLENT ABILITY TO LINK THE LEGISLATIVE REFERENCES TO THE STUDY CONTEXT. PRAISE IS GIVEN WHEN THE STUDENT SHOWS A SIGNIFICANT MASTERY OF THE THEORETICAL AND OPERATIONAL CONTENT, PRESENTING THE TOPICS WITH CONSIDERABLE OWNERSHIP OF LANGUAGE AND AUTONOMOUS PROCESSING SKILLS EVEN IN CONTEXTS DIFFERENT FROM THOSE PROPOSED BY THE PROFESSOR.
Texts
VARANO - BARSOTTI, LA TRADIZIONE GIURIDICA OCCIDENTALE, VOL. I, ULTIMA ED., GIAPPICHELLI, (INTRODUZIONE AL DIRITTO COMPARATO, LA TRADIZIONE DI CIVIL LAW, LA TRADIZIONE DI COMMON LAW).
C. COSENTINO (2023), ENVIRONMENTAL CLAIMS: QUANDO LA DISINFORMAZIONE "SI VESTE DI VERDE", IN COMPARAZIONE E DIRITTO CIVILE, VOL.1, P. 79 SS.
C. COSENTINO, (2021), THE TRAGEDY OF “COMMONS”: QUALE FUTURA PROSPETTIVA?, IN TERRE, ACQUE, DIRITTO. FORME DELLE SOCIETÀ ANTICHE, ATTI DEL CONVEGNO DEL CENTRO STUDI SUI FONDAMENTI DEL DIRITTO ANTICO, NAPOLI, EDITORIALE SCIENTIFICA NAPOLI, P. 381 SS.
M. PENNASILICO, (2017), CONTRATTO ECOLOGICO E CONFORMAZIONE DELL’AUTONOMIA NEGOZIALE, IN RIVISTA QUADRIMESTRALE DI DIRITTO DELLAMBIENTE, P. 4 SS.
C. COSENTINO (2023), CYBERSECURITY E DATA PROTECTION: UN INSCINDIBILE BINOMIO, IN IURA AND LEGAL SYSTEMS, VOL. 10, P. 8 SS.
M. GRANIERI, (2023), UNA SINOPSI COMPARATIVA E UNA PROSPETTIVA CRITICA SUI TENTATIVI DI REGOLAZIONE DELL’INTELLIGENZA ARTIFICIALE, IN COMPARAZIONE E DIRITTO CIVILE, P. 2 SS.
More Information
ITALIAN IS THE TEACHING LANGUAGE.
THE PROFESSOR IS ALWAYS AVAILABLE, IN RECEPTION HOURS, TO OFFER INFORMATION AND / OR DISSOLVING DOUBTS RELATED TO THE PROGRAM, THE COURSE AND EXAMS.
IT IS ADVISED TO MONITOR THE WEB SITE OF THE DEPARTMENT AND THE TEACHER’S PERSONAL PAGE, ACCESSIBLE BY UNIVERSITY ADDRESS BOOK.
  BETA VERSION Data source ESSE3 [Ultima Sincronizzazione: 2025-07-16]