Barbara MESSINA | ARCHITECTURAL DRAWING I
Barbara MESSINA ARCHITECTURAL DRAWING I
cod. 0660100006
ARCHITECTURAL DRAWING I
0660100006 | |
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING | |
EQF7 | |
BUILDING ENGINEERING - ARCHITECTURE | |
2022/2023 |
OBBLIGATORIO | |
YEAR OF COURSE 1 | |
YEAR OF DIDACTIC SYSTEM 2017 | |
FULL ACADEMIC YEAR |
SSD | CFU | HOURS | ACTIVITY | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ICAR/17 | 12 | 120 | LESSONS |
Objectives | |
---|---|
LEARNING OUTCOMES AND COMPETENCE TO BE ACQUIRED: TO LEARN, THROUGH THE BALANCED STUDY OF GEOMETRICAL MODELS OF THE THREE-DIMENSIONAL SPACE, THE FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTS OF THE TECHNICAL DRAWING; TO ACQUIRE THE ABILITY TO EXPRESS IN CORRECT TERMS, AND TO GRAPHICALLY REPRESENT, THE CHARACTERISTIC ELEMENTS OF THE ARCHITECTURAL BUILDINGS AND CIVIL ENGINEERING. KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING: UNDERSTANDING THE USED TERMINOLOGY IN CONCEPTUAL, LOGICAL AND PHYSICAL MODELS, OF THE GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION, OF THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGIES, OF THE FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS OF ARCHITECTURAL GRAPHIC LANGUAGE. APPLYING KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING: KNOWING HOW TO DEVELOP, ACCORDING TO ENCODED CONVENTIONAL NORMS, GRAPHICAL MODELS OF ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE. MAKING JUDGEMENTS: KNOWING HOW TO IDENTIFY THE MOST APPROPRIATE METHODS FOR DRAWING CONSTRUCTIVE ELEMENTS OF ARCHITECTURAL SPACE, OPTIMIZING THE REPRESENTATION PROCESS ACCORDING TO THE ANALYZED CONTEXT. COMMUNICATION SKILLS: ABILITY TO WORK IN A TEAM AND TO VERBALLY AND GRAPHICALLY EXPLAIN AN ARGUMENT RELATED TO THE DISCUSSED TOPICS. LEARNING SKILLS: KNOWING HOW TO APPLY THE ACQUIRED KNOWLEDGE AND KNOW HOW TO LEARN INDEPENDENTLY THE NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN KNOWLEDGE. |
Prerequisites | |
---|---|
PREREQUISITES: FOR THE ACHIEVEMENT OF THE PREFIXED GOALS IS REQUIRED THE KNOWLEDGE OF EUCLIDEAN GEOMETRY. PREPARATORY COURSES: NONE. |
Contents | |
---|---|
TECHNICAL GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION: DRAWING AS A CODIFIED GRAPHIC LANGUAGE FOR THE ANALYSIS AND COMMUNICATION OF REALITY. TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES OF REPRESENTATION. GRAPHIC AND GEOMETRIC MODELS. DESCRIPTIVE GEOMETRIC MODELS OF ARCHITECTURAL SPACE AND TERRITORY. HISTORY OF DRAWING. GASPARD MONGE: THE BIRTH OF THE SCIENCE OF GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION IN THE CONTEXT OF THE EDUCATIONAL CURRICULUM OF THE CONTEMPORARY ENGINEER (6 HOURS LESSON; 2 HOURS CLASSROOM EXERCICES). GEOMETRICAL FOUNDATIONS OF GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION: FUNDAMENTALS OF PROJECTIVE GEOMETRY. PROJECTIVE PLANE TRANSFORMATIONS SUITABLE FOR REPRESENTING THE STRUCTURE OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL SPACE. HOMOLOGY PLANES (8 HOURS LESSON; 4 HOURS CLASSROOM EXERCICES). GEOMETRIC MODELS OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL SPACE: METHODS OF REPRESENTATION OF DESCRIPTIVE GEOMETRY. THE MONGE MODEL (ORTHOGONAL PROJECTIONS); AXONOMETRIC MODELS; DIMENSIONED PROJECTION MODEL. GRAPHIC PROBLEMS OF THE INVESTIGATED METHODS: REPRESENTATION OF FUNDAMENTAL ENTITIES, POSITION PROBLEMS, REMARKABLE PROBLEMS. REPRESENTATION OF SOLIDS AND THEIR INTERSECTIONS AND INTERPENETRATIONS. CORRESPONDENCES BETWEEN DIFFERENT GEOMETRIC MODELS; CHANGE OF REPRESENTATION METHOD (26 HOURS LESSON; 18 HOURS CLASSROOM EXERCICES). FROM GEOMETRIC MODELS TO GRAPHIC MODELS: GRAPHIC SCALES; THE LEVEL OF DEFINITION OF THE DRAWING. THE CONVENTIONAL AND ICONIC COMPONENTS OF REPRESENTATION AT DIFFERENT SCALES. THE SELECTION OF THE METHOD OF REPRESENTATION. THE GRAPHIC ELEMENTS OF THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWING. THE DEFINITION OF THE GRAPHIC MODELS. THE STRUCTURE OF THE MODEL. THE GRAPHIC SEMIOLOGY; THE ELEMENTARY UNITS AND THE FORMS OF ARTICULATION OF THE TECHNICAL-GRAPHIC EXPRESSION. THE GRAPHIC VARIABLES. GRAPHIC-SYMBOLIC CONVENTIONS AND CODIFICATIONS. LEXICAL, GRAMMATICAL, AND SYNTACTIC CONVENTIONS. TYPOLOGY OF SIGNS: DISCRETE AND NON-DISCRETE, TEXTURES. PEIRCE'S THEORY AND MOLES' THEORY. ICONIC, MOTIVATED, AND UNMOTIVATED SIGNS. CRITERIA FOR CHOOSING SIGNS. RULES AND SYMBOLOGY FOR THE TECHNICAL DRAWING OF ARCHITECTURE. THE DIMENSIONING OF ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. SURVEY DRAWING, PROJECT DRAWING, AND RELATED DRAWINGS: PLANS, ELEVATIONS, SECTIONS, AXONOMETRY, AXONOMETRIC CUTAWAYS (10 HOURS LESSON; 4 HOURS CLASSROOM EXERCICES). MORPHOLOGY AND REPRESENTATION OF CONSTRUCTIVE ELEMENTS FOR THE DEFINITION OF ARCHITECTURAL SPACE UP TO THE NINETEENTH CENTURY. GEOMETRIC INTERPRETATION AND REPRESENTATION OF CONSTITUENT SURFACES. VERTICAL CLOSURE ELEMENTS: WALLS, FUNCTIONS, TYPES, AND DESIGN OF WALL TEXTURES. ROOF ELEMENTS OF THE ARCHITECTURAL SPACE: CYLINDRICAL VAULTS. TYPOLOGY AND GEOMETRY OF SIMPLE AND COMPOSITE VAULTS: BARREL VAULTS, PAVILION VAULTS, RIBBED VAULTS. SIMPLE AND COMPOUND SPHERICAL VAULTS: DOMES, RIBBED VAULTS, VAULTS WITH SPHERICAL PENDANTS. INCLINED VAULTS: GEOMETRIC CONFIGURATION OF THE ROOF. CONNECTING ELEMENTS: STAIRS, CHARACTERISTIC ELEMENTS; HELICOIDAL STAIRS (20 HOURS LESSON; 12 HOURS CLASSROOM EXERCICES). INFOGRAPHIC REPRESENTATION: EVOLUTION OF DRAWING TOOLS. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES. COMPUTER GRAPHICS REPRESENTATION SYSTEMS. INFOGRAPHIC REPRESENTATION PROGRAMS; BASIC AND APPLICATION SOFTWARE. DIGITAL MODEL AND GRAPHIC MODEL. INFOGRAPHIC VARIABLES. INFOGRAPHIC LANGUAGE AS A NEW FORM OF EXPRESSION (10 HOURS WORKSHOP ACTIVITIES). |
Teaching Methods | |
---|---|
THE COURSE PROVIDES LESSONS (7 CFU), CLASSROOM EXERCISES (4 CFU) AND WORKSHOP ACTIVITIES (1 CFU). DURING THE EXERCISES SESSION, STUDENTS ARE REQUIRED TO PROCESS DRAWINGS RELATED WITH THE THEORETICAL ARGUMENTS AND THEMES SHOWN DURING THE LESSONS. IN THE WORKSHOP ACTIVITIES THEY MUST ACQUIRE KNOWLEDGE OF THE INFOGRAPHIC REPRESENTATION’S EQUIPMENT (SOFTWARE FOR INFOGRAPHIC DRAWING). ATTENDANCE TO THE COURSE IS COMPULSORY: THE MINIMUM PERCENTAGE REQUIRED IS AT 70%. THE PROFESSOR WILL CHECK THE PERCENTAGE OF REQUIRED PRESENCE BY MEANS OF ELECTRONIC DETECTION IS THROUGH THE VERIFICATION OF THE EFFECTIVE PARTICIPATION IN EXERCISES SESSION AND WORKSHOP ACTIVITIES, CONFIRMED BY THE SIGNATURE OF THE TEACHER ON THE PRODUCED IN THE CLASSROOM. |
Verification of learning | |
---|---|
WITH A FINAL EXAMINATION, WHICH PROVIDES GRAPHIC AND ORAL CHECK, ARE VERIFIED THE ACHIEVED RESULTS. THE GRAPHIC CHECK CONSISTS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SERIES OF GRAPHS, THROUGH WHICH THE STUDENT SHOULD DEMONSTRATE TO KNOW, IN ACCORDANCE WITH CODIFIED CONVENTIONAL STANDARDS, GRAPHICAL MODELS OF ARCHITECTURE. IT IS REQUESTED ALTHOUGH AUTONOMY IN KNOWING HOW TO IDENTIFY MORE EFFECTIVE METHODS FOR THE COMPLETE UNDERSTANDING OF THE ANALYZED ELEMENTS, OPTIMIZING THE REPRESENTATION PROCESS ACCORDING TO THE CONTEXT. THE GRAPHIC TEST WILL BE CARRIED OUT WITH THE AID OF SOFTWARE FOR THE INFOGRAPHIC DRAWING. THE OVERCOMING OF THIS CHECK, TO WHICH NO VOTE IS GRANTED, GIVES ACCESS TO THE ORAL CHECK. THE ORAL CKECK CONSISTS IN A DISCUSSION ON THE ELABORATES PRODUCED IN THE GRAPHIC TEST, ON THE EXERCISES AND LABORATORY ACTIVITIES. IN THE ORAL CHECK THE STUDENT SHOULD DEMONSTRATE TO HAVE LEARNED THE FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTS OF TECHNICAL GRAPHIC LANGUAGE, NECESSARY FOR THE FORMULATION AND READING OF THE GRAPHIC MODELS OF ARCHITECTURE AND THE TERRITORY, BOTH WITH REFERENCE TO THE PROJECT REALITY (DESIGN DRAWING) AND THAT BUILT (SURVEY DRAWING). IT WILL ALSO SHOW THE MASTERY OF THE REPRESENTATION METHODS AND THE GRAPHIC CONVENTIONS NECESSARY TO REPRESENT THE BUILDING SPACE, THE TERMINOLOGY USED IN THE CONCEPTUAL, LOGICAL AND PHYSICAL MODELS OF THE GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION, THE PROJECT AND DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGIES, THE FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS OF THE ARCHITECTURAL GRAPHIC LANGUAGE. THE LEVEL OF EVALUATION OF THE TESTS TAKES INTO ACCOUNT THE RELEVANCE OF THE METHODS USED, THE COMPLETENESS AND ACCURACY OF THE RESPONSES, AS WELL AS THE ABILITY TO ORALLY AND GRAPHICLY PRESENT THE TREATED ARGUMENTS. THE MINIMUM LEVEL OF EVALUATION (18) IS ASSIGNED WHEN THE STUDENT DEMONSTRATES A PARTIAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE PROPOSED METHODS AND GRAPHIC PROCEDURES, AND HAS LIMITED KNOWLEDGE OF THE BASIC FUNDAMENTALS OF THE VARIOUS TOPICS ADDRESSED. THE MAXIMUM EVALUATION LEVEL (30) IS ASSIGNED WHEN THE STUDENT DEMONSTRATES A COMPLETE AND IN-DEPTH KNOWLEDGE OF THE PROPOSED GRAPHIC METHODS AND PROCEDURES, AND IS ABLE TO SOLVE THE PROBLEMS FACED BY ARRIVING IN AN EFFICIENT AND GRAPHICALLY ACCURATE WAY TO THE SOLUTION, SHOWING A FULL CAPACITY TO APPLY THE THEORETICAL PRESUPPOSITIONS IN PRACTICE. THE PRAISE IS ATTRIBUTED WHEN THE CANDIDATE DEMONSTRATES AN ABSOLUTE MASTERY OF THE THEORETICAL AND APPLICATIVE CONTENTS, AND IS ABLE TO PRESENT THE TOPICS WITH CONSIDERABLE LANGUAGE PROPERTIES, BEING ABLE TO ELABORATE GEOMETRIC MODELS AND GRAPHS INDEPENDENTLY ALSO WITH REFERENCE TO COMPLEX PROBLEMS NOT TREATED BY THE PROFESSOR. AT MID COURSE (JANUARY-FEBRUARY), THE TEACHER CAN EVALUATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO CARRY OUT AN ONGOING GRAPHICS TEST WITH PURPOSE OF SELF-EVALUATION BY THE STUDENTS. |
Texts | |
---|---|
ESSENTIAL BIBLIOGRAPHY: V. CARDONE, MODELLI GRAFICI DELL’ARCHITETTURA E DEL TERRITORIO, MAGGIOLI EDITORE, BOLOGNA 2013 B. MESSINA, ESERCITAZIONI DI DISEGNO, VOL. I, MAGGIOLI, BOLOGNA 2013 E. NEUFERT, ENCICLOPEDIA PRATICA PER PROGETTARE E COSTRUIRE, HOEPLI, MILANO 2013 SUGGESTED BIBLIOGRAPHY: L. BENEVOLO, INTRODUZIONE ALL’ARCHITETTURA, LATERZA, BARI 1960. V. CARDONE, GASPARD MONGE, PADRE DELL'INGEGNERE CONTEMPORANEO, DEI, ROMA 2017. V. CARDONE, VIAGGIATORI D’ARCHITETTURA IN ITALIA. DA BRUNELLESCHI A CHARLES GARNIER, UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI SALERNO, IN CO-EDIZIONE CON LIBRERIA UNIVERSITARIA.IT, PADOVA, 2014. V. CARDONE, REALTÀ, MODELLO, IMMAGINE NELLA RAPPRESENTAZIONE INFOGRAFICA DELLA REALTÀ, IN M. DELL’AQUILA E A. DE ROSA (A CURA DI) ‘REALTÀ VIRTUALE O VISIONE REALE?’, ARTE TIPOGRAFICA, NAPOLI 2002. V. CARDONE, MODELLI GRAFICI E MODELLI INFORMATICI, IN M. DELL’AQUILA E A. DE ROSA (A CURA DI), ‘PROIEZIONE E IMMAGINE. LA LOGICA DELLA RAPPRESENTAZIONE’, ARTE TIPOGRAFICA, NAPOLI 2000. V. CARDONE, IL TUFO NUDO NELL’ARCHITETTURA NAPOLETANA, CUEN, NAPOLI 1990. M. DOCCI, MANUALE DI DISEGNO ARCHITETTONICO, LATERZA, BARI 1990. UNI STANDARDS FOR TECHNICAL DRAWING: UNI ISO 128-24:2006, DISEGNI TECNICI - PRINCIPI GENERALI DI RAPPRESENTAZIONE - PARTE 24: LINEE UTILIZZATE NEI DISEGNI DI MECCANICA E DI INGEGNERIA INDUSTRIALE; UNI EN ISO 5455:1998, DISEGNI TECNICI – SCALE; UNI EN ISO 7200:2007, DOCUMENTAZIONE TECNICA DI PRODOTTO - AREE DEI DATI NEI RIQUADRI DELLE ISCRIZIONI E DELLE INTESTAZIONI DEI DOCUMENTI; UNI EN ISO 5456-2:2001, DISEGNI TECNICI - METODI DI PROIEZIONE - RAPPRESENTAZIONI ORTOGRAFICHE; UNI ISO 128-30:2006, DISEGNI TECNICI - PRINCIPI GENERALI DI RAPPRESENTAZIONE - PARTE 30: CONVENZIONI FONDAMENTALI PER LE VISTE; UNI ISO 128-40:2006, DISEGNI TECNICI - PRINCIPI GENERALI DI RAPPRESENTAZIONE - PARTE 40: CONVENZIONI FONDAMENTALI PER TAGLI E SEZIONI; UNI ISO 128-44:2006, DISEGNI TECNICI - PRINCIPI GENERALI DI RAPPRESENTAZIONE - PARTE 44: SEZIONI NEI DISEGNI DI INGEGNERIA MECCANICA E INDUSTRIALE. |
More Information | |
---|---|
FURTHER DIDACTIC MATERIALS WILL BE DISTRIBUTED ON THE PROFESSOR'S INSTITUTIONAL WEBSITE OR ON THE TEAMS PLATFORM |
BETA VERSION Data source ESSE3 [Ultima Sincronizzazione: 2024-08-21]