2. Professors
  3. Teaching

DRAWING

Marco LIMONGIELLO DRAWING

0612500005
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
EQF6
CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
2021/2022

OBBLIGATORIO
YEAR OF COURSE 1
YEAR OF DIDACTIC SYSTEM 2018
FULL ACADEMIC YEAR
CFUHOURSACTIVITY
1FONDAMENTI E APPLICAZIONI DI GEOMETRIA DESCRITTIVA
660LESSONS
2CAD E INTRODUZIONE AL GIS
330LESSONS
BARBARA MESSINA1 T Curriculum
MARCO LIMONGIELLO2 Curriculum
Objectives
LEARNING OUTCOMES AND COMPETENCE TO BE ACQUIRED:
TO LEARN, THROUGH THE BALANCED STUDY OF GEOMETRICAL MODELS OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL SPACE, THE TECHNICAL DRAWING'S FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTS OF THE TECHNICAL DRAWING; TO ACQUIRE THE ABILITY TO EXPRESS IN CORRECT TERMS, AND TO GRAPHICALLY REPRESENT, THE CHARACTERISTIC ELEMENTS OF THE CIVIL ENGINEERING AND THE TERRITORY, THEREFORE WITH REFERENCE TO THE PROJECT REALITY (PROJECT DRAWING) THAT TO THE BUILT ONE (SURVEY DRAWING).
KNOWING THE BASICS OF THE USE OF THE MOST COMMON SOFTWARE FOR INFOGRAPHIC DESIGN THROUGH CAD AND BIM SYSTEMS (CIVIL ENGINEERING), AND GIS (CIVIL ENGINEERING FOR THE ENVIRONMENT AND TERRITORY).

KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING:
UNDERSTANDING THE USED TERMINOLOGY IN CONCEPTUAL, LOGICAL AND PHYSICAL MODELS, OF THE GRAPHIC AND INFOGRAPHIC REPRESENTATION, OF THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGIES, OF THE FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS OF GRAPHIC AND INFOGRAPHIC LANGUAGE FOR CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING.

APPLYING KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING:
KNOWING HOW TO DEVELOP, ACCORDING TO ENCODED CONVENTIONAL NORMS, GRAPHICAL AND INFOGRAPHIC MODELS OF CIVIL AND TERRITORIAL ENGINEERING.

MAKING JUDGEMENTS:
KNOWING HOW TO IDENTIFY THE MOST APPROPRIATE METHODS FOR DRAWING CONSTRUCTIVE ELEMENTS OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, OPTIMIZING THE REPRESENTATION PROCESS ACCORDING TO THE ANALYZED CONTEXT.

COMMUNICATION SKILLS:
ABILITY TO WORK IN A TEAM AND TO VERBALLY AND GRAPHICALLY EXPLAIN AN ARGUMENT RELATED TO THE DISCUSSED TOPICS.

LEARNING SKILLS:
KNOWING HOW TO APPLY THE ACQUIRED KNOWLEDGE AND KNOW HOW TO LEARN INDEPENDENTLY THE NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN KNOWLEDGE.
Prerequisites
PREREQUISITES: FOR THE ACHIEVEMENT OF THE PREFIXED GOALS IS REQUIRED THE KNOWLEDGE OF EUCLIDEAN GEOMETRY.
PREPARATORY COURSES: NONE
Contents
MODULE 1
THE TECHNICAL GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION (4 HOURS LESSON).

THE FUNDAMENTALS OF GRAPHICAL GEOMETRIC REPRESENTATION (6 HOURS LESSON; 2 HOURS EXERCICES).

GEOMETRIC MODELS OF THE THREE-DIMENSIONAL SPACE (24 HOURS LESSON; 16 HOURS EXERCICES).

GRAPHICAL MODELS (6 HOURS LESSON; 2 HOURS EXERCICES).

MODULE 2 (CIVIL ENGINEERING)
INFOGRAPHIC REPRESENTATION. CAD AND BIM SYSTEMS (10 LABORATORY ACTIVITIES).

MORPHOLOGY AND REPRESENTATION OF THE MAIN CIVIL ENGINEERING'S CONSTRUCTIVE ELEMENTS (6 HOURS LESSON; 8 HOURS EXERCICES).

THE ARCHITECTURAL SURVEY (4 HOURS LESSON; 2 HOURS EXERCISES).

MODULE 2 (ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING)
INFOGRAPHIC REPRESENTATION. GIS SYSTEMS (10 LABORATORY ACTIVITIES).

MORPHOLOGY AND REPRESENTATION OF THE MAIN CIVIL ENGINEERING'S CONSTRUCTIVE ELEMENTS (6 HOURS LESSON; 8 HOURS EXERCICES)

PHYSICAL AND THEMATIC MODELS OF ENVIRONMENT AND TERRITORY (4 HOURS LESSON; 2 HOURS EXERCICES).
Teaching Methods
THE COURSE PROVIDES LESSONS (5 CFU), EXERCISES (3 CFU) AND LABORATORY ACTIVITIES IN THE CLASSROOM (1 CFU). DURING THE EXERCISES IN THE CLASSROOM, STUDENTS ARE REQUIRED TO PROCESS DRAWINGS RELATED WITH THE THEORETICAL ARGUMENTS AND THEMES FROM TIME TO TIME SHOWN DURING THE LESSONS. IN THE LABORATORIES THEY MUST ACQUIRE KNOWLEDGE OF THE INFOGRAPHIC REPRESENTATION’S EQUIPMENT (HARDWARE AND COMMON SOFTWARE).
DURING THE SECOND SEMESTER THE STUDENTS, DIVIDED INTO GROUPS, WILL BE INVOLVED IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF A GRAPHIC THEME IDENTIFIED BY THE TEACHER ON TOPICS RELATED TO THE SURVEY AND THEMATIC MAPPING, IN ORDER TO PRACTICE THE KNOWLEDGE ACQUIRED AND DEVELOP RELATIONAL AND COOPERATION CAPACITIES.
ATTENDANCE TO THE COURSE IS COMPULSORY: THE MINIMUM PERCENTAGE REQUIRED IS AT 70%. THE PROFESSOR WILL CHECK THE PERCENTAGE OF REQUIRED PRESENCE BY MEANS OF ELECTRONIC DETECTION IS THROUGH THE VERIFICATION OF THE EFFECTIVE PARTICIPATION IN EXERCITIVE AND LABORATORY ACTIVITIES, CONFIRMED BY THE SIGNATURE OF THE TEACHER ON THE PRODUCED IN THE CLASSROM.
Verification of learning
WITH A FINAL EXAMINATION, WHICH PROVIDES GRAPHIC AND ORAL CHECK, ARE VERIFIED THE ACHIEVED RESULTS. THE EXAMINATION IS CALENDARIZED FROM THE END OF TEACHING ACTIVITIES.

THE GRAPHIC CHECK (3 HOURS) CONSISTS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SERIES OF GRAPHS, THROUGH WHICH THE STUDENT SHOULD DEMONSTRATE TO KNOW, IN ACCORDANCE WITH CODIFIED CONVENTIONAL STANDARDS, GRAPHICAL MODELS OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND THE TERRITORY.
IT IS REQUESTED ALTHOUGH AUTONOMY IN KNOWING HOW TO IDENTIFY MORE EFFECTIVE METHODS FOR THE COMPLETE UNDERSTANDING OF THE ANALYZED ELEMENTS, OPTIMIZING THE REPRESENTATION PROCESS ACCORDING TO THE CONTEXT. THE GRAPHIC TEST WILL BE CARRIED OUT WITH THE AID OF SOFTWARE FOR THE INFOGRAPHIC DRAWING. THE OVERCOMING OF THIS CHECK, TO WHICH NO VOTE IS GRANTED, GIVES ACCESS TO THE ORAL CHECK.

THE ORAL CKECK CONSISTS IN A DISCUSSION ON THE ELABORATES PRODUCED IN THE GRAPHIC TEST, ON THE EXERCISES AND LABORATORY ACTIVITIES.
IN THE ORAL CHECK THE STUDENT SHOULD DEMONSTRATE TO HAVE LEARNED THE FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTS OF TECHNICAL GRAPHIC LANGUAGE, NECESSARY FOR THE FORMULATION AND READING OF THE GRAPHIC MODELS OF ARCHITECTURE AND THE TERRITORY, BOTH WITH REFERENCE TO THE PROJECT REALITY (DESIGN DRAWING) AND THAT BUILT (SURVEY DRAWING). IT WILL ALSO SHOW THE MASTERY OF THE REPRESENTATION METHODS AND THE GRAPHIC CONVENTIONS NECESSARY TO REPRESENT THE BUILDING SPACE, THE TERMINOLOGY USED IN THE CONCEPTUAL, LOGICAL AND PHYSICAL MODELS OF THE GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION, THE PROJECT AND DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGIES, THE FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS OF THE ARCHITECTURAL GRAPHIC LANGUAGE.

THE LEVEL OF EVALUATION OF THE TESTS TAKES INTO ACCOUNT THE RELEVANCE OF THE METHODS USED, THE COMPLETENESS AND ACCURACY OF THE RESPONSES, AS WELL AS THE ABILITY TO ORALLY AND GRAPHICLY PRESENT THE TREATED ARGUMENTS.
THE MINIMUM LEVEL OF EVALUATION (18) IS ASSIGNED WHEN THE STUDENT DEMONSTRATES A MINIMUM COMPETENCE IN THE APPLICATION OF THE PROPOSED METHODS AND GRAPHIC PROCEDURES, AND A KNOWLEDGE OF THE BASIC FUNDAMENTALS OF THE VARIOUS TOPICS ADDRESSED.
THE MAXIMUM EVALUATION LEVEL (30) IS ASSIGNED WHEN THE STUDENT DEMONSTRATES A COMPLETE AND IN-DEPTH KNOWLEDGE OF THE PROPOSED GRAPHIC METHODS AND PROCEDURES, AND IS ABLE TO SOLVE THE PROBLEMS FACED BY ARRIVING IN AN EFFICIENT AND GRAPHICALLY ACCURATE WAY TO THE SOLUTION, SHOWING A FULL CAPACITY TO APPLY THE THEORETICAL PRESUPPOSITIONS IN PRACTICE.
THE PRAISE IS ATTRIBUTED WHEN THE CANDIDATE DEMONSTRATES AN ABSOLUTE MASTERY OF THE THEORETICAL AND APPLICATIVE CONTENTS, AND IS ABLE TO PRESENT THE TOPICS WITH CONSIDERABLE LANGUAGE PROPERTIES, BEING ABLE TO ELABORATE GEOMETRIC MODELS AND GRAPHS INDEPENDENTLY ALSO WITH REFERENCE TO COMPLEX PROBLEMS NOT TREATED BY THE PROFESSOR.

AT THE END OF MODULE 1 (JANUARY-FEBRUARY) AN ON-GOING TEST IS SCHEDULED ON THE TOPICS COVERED DURING THE FIRST SEMESTER.
THIS TEST CONSISTS OF A GRAPHIC VERIFICATION AND AN ORAL DISCUSSION OF THE TABLES CARRIED OUT DURING THE EXERCISES. THE TEST IS AIMED AT ASSESSING THEORETICAL LEARNING AND THE ABILITY OF STUDENTS TO APPLY THE PROCEDURES STUDIED IN PRACTICE WITH REFERENCE TO A SERIES OF CONCRETE GRAPHIC PROBLEMS TO BE SOLVED IN THE DIFFERENT METHODS OF DESCRIPTIVE GEOMETRY.
Texts
V. CARDONE, GASPARD MONGE, PADRE DELL'INGEGNERE CONTEMPORANEO, DEI, ROMA 2017;
V. CARDONE, MODELLI GRAFICI DELL’ARCHITETTURA E DEL TERRITORIO, MAGGIOLI EDITORE, BOLOGNA 2013;
V. CARDONE, MODELLI GRAFICI E MODELLI INFORMATICI, IN M. DELL’AQUILA E A. DE ROSA (A CURA DI), ‘PROIEZIONE E IMMAGINE. LA LOGICA DELLA RAPPRESENTAZIONE’, ARTE TIPOGRAFICA, NAPOLI 2000;
V. CARDONE, REALTÀ, MODELLO, IMMAGINE NELLA RAPPRESENTAZIONE INFOGRAFICA DELLA REALTÀ, IN M. DELL’AQUILA E A. DE ROSA (A CURA DI) ‘REALTÀ VIRTUALE O VISIONE REALE?’, ARTE TIPOGRAFICA, NAPOLI 2002;
V. CARDONE, VIAGGIATORI D’ARCHITETTURA IN ITALIA. DA BRUNELLESCHI A CHARLES GARNIER, UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI SALERNO, IN CO-EDIZIONE CON LIBRERIA UNIVERSITARIA.IT, PADOVA, 2014;
V. IANNIZZARO, DALLE “MAPPAE MUNDI” ALLE IMMAGINI SATELLITARI - RAPPRESENTAZIONE DEL TERRITORIO E CARTOGRAFIA TEMATICA, CUES, SALERNO 2006;
B. MESSINA, ESERCITAZIONI DI DISEGNO, VOL. I, MAGGIOLI, BOLOGNA 2013
E. NEUFERT, ENCICLOPEDIA PRATICA PER PROGETTARE E COSTRUIRE, HOEPLI, MILANO 2013

NORME UNI PER IL DISEGNO TECNICO:
UNI ISO 128-24:2006, DISEGNI TECNICI - PRINCIPI GENERALI DI RAPPRESENTAZIONE - PARTE 24: LINEE UTILIZZATE NEI DISEGNI DI MECCANICA E DI INGEGNERIA INDUSTRIALE;
UNI EN ISO 5455:1998, DISEGNI TECNICI – SCALE;
UNI EN ISO 7200:2007, DOCUMENTAZIONE TECNICA DI PRODOTTO - AREE DEI DATI NEI RIQUADRI DELLE ISCRIZIONI E DELLE INTESTAZIONI DEI DOCUMENTI;
UNI EN ISO 5456-2:2001, DISEGNI TECNICI - METODI DI PROIEZIONE - RAPPRESENTAZIONI ORTOGRAFICHE;
UNI ISO 128-30:2006, DISEGNI TECNICI - PRINCIPI GENERALI DI RAPPRESENTAZIONE - PARTE 30: CONVENZIONI FONDAMENTALI PER LE VISTE;
UNI ISO 128-40:2006, DISEGNI TECNICI - PRINCIPI GENERALI DI RAPPRESENTAZIONE - PARTE 40: CONVENZIONI FONDAMENTALI PER TAGLI E SEZIONI;
UNI ISO 128-44:2006, DISEGNI TECNICI - PRINCIPI GENERALI DI RAPPRESENTAZIONE - PARTE 44: SEZIONI NEI DISEGNI DI INGEGNERIA MECCANICA E INDUSTRIALE.
  BETA VERSION Data source ESSE3 [Ultima Sincronizzazione: 2022-11-21]